Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2009, 2:49 pm
"Applying our understanding of Supreme Court precedent, we decline to create, on our own, a new cause of action against officers and employees of the federal government," Chief Judge Dennis G. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
An expert from Vermont, which in 2000 became thefirst jurisdiction in the United States to enact a civil union law, testified that civil union couplesthere still face problems with the law today. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am by Paul Stern
That is not to suggest that the federal government cannot play a role in promoting reform. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:31 am by Ben Vernia
The Civil Division represents the United States, its agencies, Members of Congress, Cabinet officers and other Federal employees. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding the associations had not shown any likelihood of success on the merits, the court would not order a preliminary injunction (American Hotel & Lodging Assn. v. [read post]