Search for: "Application of Johnson" Results 1181 - 1200 of 4,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
Johnson concludes there is "no clear and reasoned prior authority" supporting Technicolor in this respect. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Department of Justice National Security Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 ATTN: Kia Johnson, Room 7636 No telephone calls please. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by John Bellinger
Government’s views of the international legal framework applicable to the U.S. conflict with al Qaida, informed in part by two years of extensive discussions with U.S. allies. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
" This fact became immaterial after the ARB's well-considered decision in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:13 am by Schachtman
Judge Johnson took judicial notice of a non-fact. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm by Steve Sady
The Ninth Circuit rule was that, in order to "avoid unconstitutional application of Sentencing Guidelines," the acceptance of responsibility guideline had to be construed so that "a sentencing court cannot consider against a defendant any constitutionally protected conduct. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am by Stuart N. Brotman
Biden recently ordered 100 million more doses of the Johnson & Johnson single-shot vaccine. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:47 pm by Cody M. Poplin
 Jane Harman, President of the Wilson Center, will introduce Secretary Johnson. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Trademark application for the devil's horn withdrawnGuestKat Mathilde Pavis discusses the recent decision from the USPTO notified the withdrawal, by express abandonment, of Gene Simmons's trade mark application for the hand gesture known as the devil's horns. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
That's pretty strong language - "a door to a brick wall" - Judge Johnson used to describe the majority's position! [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]