Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2018, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
There was one privacy trial, in the Chancery Division before Arnold J (Ali v Channel 5 [2018] EWHC 298 (Ch) – see our case comment here). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  which causes actual damage to the business or goodwill of the trader bringing the action.In the recent ‘ Vodkat’ case, Diageo North America Inc v Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Ltd [2010] EWHC 17 (Ch), Arnold J held that "vodka" is a term that is capable of distinguishing a particular class and quality of product. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
The lesson being if you are going to die, die in Indiana.Raskopf cited the case of CMG Worldwide v The Upper Deck Co., Inc case where he acted for the defendant. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 4:31 am
Arnold & Assocs., Inc., 927 F.Supp. 1098, 1101-02 (N.D.Ind.1995) ("Section 1367 provides no original jurisdiction over a separate ... but related suit. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Mr Justice Arnold's referral to the CJEU of certain questions regarding the application of the Trade Mark Directive in the dispute between Nestlé and Cadbury over Nestlé's application for a trade mark in the shape of its "KitKat" chocolate bar has already been the subject of a number of posts on IPKat (Will Kit Kat shape monopoly last forever? [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
   This year's panel, including our own Mark Arnold, did not disappoint us. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
Encouragingly, the proceedings were settled by consent order shortly before trial, which was to have been before Mr Justice Arnold in April 2011, the order providing for an inquiry as to the damages. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:21 pm
” This decision follows the CAFC precedent found in Arnold Partnership v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
 This was the tussle between two wannabe alpha males in the IP community over the talismanic trade mark OMEGA, posted on the excellent and sadly impoverished BAILII website as Omega SA v Omega Engineering Incorporated [2011] EWCA Civ 645. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by Julius Stobbs (Stobbs IP)
Arnold LJ remarked during the Appeal hearing that “the purpose of sanctions for non-use will be undermined if they can be circumvented by evergreening. [read post]