Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 68,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:02 am
Insulet Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
(SFFA) v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:55 am
Background in Maness v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
Bacardi & Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm
The point being made is that his Lordship’s prominence as a judicial expert in conflict of laws in Nigeria is noteworthy. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm
Rybar (3th Cir. 1996), he wrote: Was United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm
Graham v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:02 am
In this sense, decisions like those of the US Copyright Office in Zarya of the Dawn [IPKat here] and the Beijing Internet Court in Li v Liu [IPKat here] are helpful. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
M/V Tutor most recently docked in Russia. [read post]
