Search for: "BILLINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT v BILLING"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
” As DOJ further explained to the district cou [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:49 am
The article is broken into bills that passed and bills that are still pending. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
Other coverage includes reports by Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Martha Neil of the ABA Journal, and Bill Mears of CNN. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am
Davila, and Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Under the current rules, Republicans first filibuster the motions to bring a bill to the Senate Floor for debate, and then call for another filibuster of the actual bill itself once it arrives on the Floor. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:38 am
On the other hand, one federal district court recently upheld a professor’s religious bias claim where her religion required rejecting homosexuality and she was denied a position in a department staffed by faculty who support the LGBT community (Gadling-Cole v West Chester University, EDPa 2012). [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
The high Court’s two leading Second Amendment cases—District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
But the 5th District bought it in State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
In Lavan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 2:02 pm
Oil Trading, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
What’s more, the post’s basic argument seems to me indistinguishable from arguments a half-century ago that the Fourteenth Amendment should not be read to ban segregated schools in the states because Congress in the 1860s and ‘70s set up and funded segregated schools in the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:10 am
District Court judge for the Southern District of Iowa. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Jackson Board of Education, and Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
This contribution to our symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am
Finally, In an August 21, 2012 opinion, Central District of California Judge James V. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
Flax Managing Director, Litigation ConsultingA2L Consulting In last week’s article on the conclusion of the Apple v. [read post]
