Search for: "Brown v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 8,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
Brown. — Recently, ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm by James H. Wilson, Jr.
No, a lump sum monetary award is properly enforced as a money judgment and not through the show cause process in Virginia, as explained in Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
Brown stated that he is married, although not living with his wife, and that he had no intentions of getting a divorce. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by david
Wainwright) and Richard Kluger’s Simple Justice (Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:08 am by Timothy P. Flynn
For example, in the wake of the landmark 1954 decision in Brown v Board of Education, desegregating all public schools, the Commonwealth responded first, by refusing to comply with the decision, then taking the unusual step of closing their public schools from 1959 to 1964, until the SCOTUS righted the ship in Griffin v Prince Edward County. [read post]