Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 9,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
There are some unique facts here, but in insider trading lingo, trading based on confidential info from an employer looks a lot like “misappropriation” – which the Supreme Court upheld as a theory of liability in 1997, in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:57 am by Florian Mueller
The number one issue that Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers raised on the last day of the recent Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
  These ongoing discussions have inspired numerous policy suggestions at the federal level, but the first legislative move occurred when North Carolina’s House of Representatives passed a bill banning state and local agencies from making ransomware payments. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm by jordan
Watkins states that, “A great deal of time and energy went into these updates. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am by Daniel
Defendants involved with drugs can be charged with federal or state crimes. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Daniel
These substances are categorized from most severe (schedule I) to least severe (schedule V).Illegal possession of a prescribed drug.Other illegal drugs. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
  That way you get maximum buy-in.But even though that's always been my theoretical take on things, I'm seriously dubious of my ability to actually pull it off. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am by Richard Hunt
If a disabled user can locate and buy what they are seeking is it important that they also have some kind of access to images intended only to catch the eye? [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:40 am by Joe Mullin
This was especially true back in 2008, before patent examiners should have applied guidance from the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice v. [read post]