Search for: "California v. Harris"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
One particularly relevant case is Harris v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
SEB S.A (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Filewrapper) BPAI decision in Ex parte Regents of the University of California – What to do with an interfering patent in patent reexamination (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisconsin: Product capable of infringing use did not infringe absent proof of specific instances of such use: PrivaCash, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 21 July 2022, the BBC offered a public apology and agreed to pay damages to the former nanny of Prince William and Prince Harry following the “fabricated” and “false and malicious” allegations made by Martin Bashir that Tiggy Legge-Bourke, now Alexandra Pettifer, had an affair with Prince Charles, in order to secure his world-famous 1995 interview with Princess Diana. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 4:56 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Harris and David S. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States US General Open source, digital… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Lozinski Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Warren S. de Wied, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, MFW, Supreme Court [read post]
Academic Abstention Should Not Be a Blank Check for Arbitrary and Capricious Conduct by Universities
14 Oct 2009, 6:45 am
The case is Sharick v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States US General Open source, digital… [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris said that it was unfortunate that the Westminster Government had been forced to commission services that should be a matter for the Department of Health to implement; however, it had been left with no other option. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
