Search for: "Canning v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 125,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2024, 3:04 am by Giles Peaker
On ‘maintenance’, the Upper Tribunal considered Assethold Limited v Watts (2014) UKUT 537, Welsh v London Borough of Greenwich (2000) 3 EGLR 41, Fluor Daniel Properties Ltd and ors v Shortlands Investments Ltd (2001) 2 EGLR 103, and Mason v Totalfinaelf UK Limited (2003) EWHC 1604 (Ch), to arrive at the conclusion that a covenant to maintain was only engaged where there is some form of physical deterioration; none of the cases supports the… [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Rachel Neave
Proponents of this viewpoint also pointed to the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am by INFORRM
Jaffa Law has published an article on the question of whether you can sue trade unions, considering the recent case of Prospect v Andrew Evans. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by DLA Piper LLP
Written by: David Solander, Meghan Carey and Jessica McKinney A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit unanimously vacated the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s private fund adviser rules and amendments (Private Fund Rules),[1] stating that “no part of it can stand. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by Stuart Kaplow
” In this matter, the Court aligned itself with the reasoning articulated in the recent federal New York City v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 8:23 am by Rich Vetstein
I’m not so sure of that, given the state legislative policy of setting a hard deadline of either 30 or 50 years that they can remain in place. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court did not invalidate a state anti-miscegenation law until 1967 in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 12:44 pm by ACLU
United States means that any president can now use their official powers to commit crimes under the assumption they are now presumptively immune. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:08 am by Daniel Spiegel
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s momentous decision in Trump v. [read post]