Search for: "Christian v. United States"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 2:21 pm
The United States’ brief addressed only the substantial burden issue. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am
” Put differently, if the one doing the copying believes the customer won’t fall for the fake without a label, the product design likely does not rise to the level of trade dress. [1] Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
As to the husband’s First Amendment arguments, the Court referred to the three prong test under the United States Supreme Court case of Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
United States Steel Corp., an Indiana court found a co-worker’s Confederate flag tattoo “was not sufficiently severe and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:23 am
This decision has important implications for cases where the biosimilar manufacturer is based outside of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:23 pm
" For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motion is denied, subject to any further consideration by the United States District Judge to whom this case is randomly assigned…. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:48 am
Susan V. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Abbott Laboratories, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (07-1145). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
Through their actions, Blackwater seriously harmed the United States and violated the law. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
Gordon College v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm
The ACDP reminded Parliament that “in the United States of America, fair use has been developed over a period of a 150 years of jurisprudence, while South Africa does not have this case law history or experience”. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
In August 2007, after viewing the images, NCMEC referred the matter to the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit (MSPCCU), directing MSPCCU to images associated with the `lilhottyohh’ screen name as well as those associated with a second screen name, `lilhottee00000. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER, CHARLES WESTBROOK, RICHEY OLIVER, CRAIG PORTER, SHARON WEBER, JUNE SMITH, RITA BAKER, STEPHANIE PEDDY, BILLIE RUTH HODGES, DALLAS CHRISTIAN, AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]
