Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
The provision does not address purely private conduct. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Maureen Johnston
Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
In the Lilly case, the court relied on the fact that Lilly employed UK citizens in the UK to prosecute parent company's patents. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
” Seated prominently in the second row of the middle section of the public gallery (with the front row of that section kept empty as usual) are members of the two families who control the companies in Sebelius v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Here’s the abstract (paragraph breaks added; h/t Danny Sokol’s Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog): This Article addresses itself to two of the most significant political moments in the last decade: the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:28 am by Joy Waltemath
“But PAGA actions instead primarily seek to vindicate the public interest in enforcement of California’s labor law. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Quantity wouldn’t be enough.Doda: one size does not fit all; we agree with Google there. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
Perhaps the biggest news out of the Court yesterday was created by Noah Newkirk of Los Angeles, who interrupted the oral arguments to protest the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]