Search for: "Compli, Inc." Results 1181 - 1200 of 11,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Jennifer Sims, The Kullman Firm
Facts “Gary” and “Lindsay” were employed by Defenders, Inc., until the end of 2013. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:49 am by Sharon L. Lippett
The Enforcement Section of the Massachusetts Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth (the “Massachusetts Enforcement Section”) filed an administrative complaint (the “Complaint”) on February 15, 2018 against Scottrade, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:18 am by Tiffany Schmidt
If mega-employer Wal-Mart is getting it wrong, it is worth the effort to check and insure your business is complying with the law. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:33 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The owner is required only to show compliance with legislatively imposed conditions pertaining to the intended use.... 'Failure to comply with any condition upon a special exception, however, is sufficient ground for denial of the exception'. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:10 am by Randy Wilson
Inc magazine has published this article, How to Avoid a Social Media Lawsuit which does a good high level job of pointing out things to watch out for. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:33 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
'Failure to comply with any condition upon a special exception, however, is sufficient ground for denial of the exception'." [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:32 pm by Editorial Board
On March 26, the Staff of the Division of Trading and Markets of the SEC provided no-action letter relief from the broker-dealer registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to FundersClub Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary in connection with their internet based, Rule 506 compliant securities offerings. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:12 am by Editorial Board
Nathan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted in part and denied in part DB Structured Products, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 6:18 pm by Andrew Murray
The defendant, LaForge & Budd Construction Company, Inc., was accused of submitting false claims the the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
The court ruled that the distributor, Premier, was not fraudulently joined to destroy diversity jurisdiction and that the allegations complied with 745 ILCS5/2-621(c)(2). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 7:00 pm by Isabelle East-Richard
It sought an order requiring Payette to comply with the noncompete and nonsolicitation clauses to which he had agreed. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:43 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
On March 9, the OFCCP informed the court that the company had agreed to comply with the OFCCP’s requested on-site investigation, and as such, a hearing in the case would not be necessary. [read post]