Search for: "Corpus v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In the case of Fenwick v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
In the first opinion of the 2011 Term, in Cavazos v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
McGee v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:24 am
Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, suggested legislators in the upcoming session will try to clarify the act to tighten up the loophole created by Boeing v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:32 am
The Corpus Christi judge had ordered the state to return to that procedure, rather than continue with the new law’s requirements, because of her ruling that the new law was invalid. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:24 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 2:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Title: Maples v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm
Chan and Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Ali v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 6:22 am
This is discussed in the 1969, Corpus Christi Court of Appeals opinion, Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:29 pm
Skaftouros v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
United States suggesting that “when a prisoner’s claim would not ‘necessarily spell speedier release,’ that claim does not lie at ‘the core of habeas corpus,’” as well as the D.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 10:30 pm
Wainwright and Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:49 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
In Crump v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
Obama 13-638Issue: (1) Whether the court of appeals failed to apply the governing preponderance of the evidence standard in affirming the denial of petitioner's habeas corpus petition, thus denying him the meaningful review mandated by Boumediene v. [read post]
