Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
Shikada v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
Gill v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Upjohn v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 4:29 am
A civil rights lawsuit pending in New York in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Upsolve v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:23 pm
From Judge Angel [sic] Kelley's order today in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:40 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From New York trial judge Ariel Chesler's opinion last month in Z.U. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
In Dart v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:06 am
Judge Cites “Troubling” Discovery Patterns United States District Judge Tilman E. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The second Colombian case, Siett v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Alternatively, the alien can be “paroled,” i.e., released into the United States on conditions pending resolution of his application. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Finding that the City failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the arbitration award should be vacated on the grounds that [1] it was irrational; [2] exhibited a manifest disregard of the law; [3] that the arbitrator had engaged in misconduct or [4] that the award violated public policy, held that Supreme Court had properly granted Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award and had properly denied the City's cross-motion to vacate the award. * See… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Finding that the City failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the arbitration award should be vacated on the grounds that [1] it was irrational; [2] exhibited a manifest disregard of the law; [3] that the arbitrator had engaged in misconduct or [4] that the award violated public policy, held that Supreme Court had properly granted Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award and had properly denied the City's cross-motion to vacate the award. * See… [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:03 am
Lion's Club of Albany, California v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
The deponent may be questioned by any party as if under cross-examination. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm
Dep’t of Justice, Ericsson Agrees to Pay Over $1 Billion to Resolve FCPA Case (December 6, 2019), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsson-agrees-pay-over-1-billion-resolve-fcpa-case. [3] Deferred Prosecution Agreement, United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:53 am
Rotheli v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:00 am
In response, Nova brought a cross-motion asking the Court to restore the action to the trial list. [read post]
