Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2012, 12:01 am
As it does with each new release, Parallels said it has improved performance, with I/O operations and gaming performance 30 percent faster than they were in Parallels Desktop 7. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
But in non-salary arbitration matters, that element does not really exist. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
But in non-salary arbitration matters, that element does not really exist. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
I am rather doubtful about it, but even if it does, there was no breach of Part X. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:42 pm
He risks sounding rude, arrogant and condescending, which, if he does, would put him in good company. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
I. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:28 am
I can’t say that I blame them. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
I largely agree with Eugene’s critique. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
There is also the element of serendipity; more than once I have been discussing a research issue with an articling student or a junior associate in the library, only to have a partner wander by and suggest that the student/associate might want to consider case X or textbook Y. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
I am in no doubt that the words complained of are defamatory. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:21 pm
So, the corporate entity does not cease to exist until the termination is filed. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
[I.] [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
X was not sufficiently confidential to amount to a trade secret. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
One criticism has been that the permanent members have influenced the appointment of experts with regard to non-proliferation sanctions regimes, with potential implications for their independence.[8] Sanctions Types of Sanctions Arms Embargo Travel Ban Assets Freeze Charcoal Ban Illicit Petrol-eumExport IED Comp- onent Ban Trans-port Customs Controls Other Measures[9] Al-Shabaab Sanctions X X X X X 1267, 1989 and 2253 ISIL… [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:10 pm
The theory that the facts must not be X because X is error and hence the defense attorney surely would have objected to X just seems utterly implausible to me. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
| the special world of pesticide products, counterfeits and parallel imports | New CJEU reference ... asking whether InfoSoc Directive envisages digital exhaustion | Freedom of panorama in Italy: does it exist? [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:11 am
All of which is to say that when policymakers adopt policies X and Y at the same time, simply observing that we achieved the desired outcome does not mean than Y, or even (X, Y), was the right policy to adopt. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
He does not look good. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:05 pm
" There is an active debate in the international human rights literature about this critique, but here I want to assume for the sake of argument that the critics are right: Knowing that Dictator X has signed onto the Convention Against Torture or the Genocide Convention does not tell us that Dictator X is less likely than Dictator Y (whose country has not signed on) to commit torture or genocide. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:08 am
The forum noted:On the noninfringement side, let me come at it from the easy way: Client A comes to a lawyer and asks, "I want to make a new pizza, do I infringe any patents if I do so? [read post]
