Search for: "David v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 14,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2015, 6:02 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Bloomberg BNA (subscription required), David Faigman contends that the Court’s recent decision in Glossip v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
 At ACSblog, David H. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:43 am by Meg Martin
Perry, Judge.Representing Hackett: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina Kerin, Appellate Counsel; David E. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 1:22 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post is shared from Judge David Langham and I would encourage to read his blog at: http://flojcc.blogspot.com/ David Langham is the Deputy Chief Judge of Compensation Claims for the Florida Office of Judges of Compensation Claims and Division of Administrative Hearings. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
State, a capital murder case out of Collin County.Appellant's opening - David A. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Josh Blackman
David McKnight's influential treatise observed that "[i]t is obvious that . . . the President is not regarded as 'an officer of, or under, the United States,' but as one branch of 'the Government.'" In Mississippi v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) As VC readers know, an all-star cast of constitutional legal scholars, including three Volokhians, submitted an amicus brief in NLRB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm by Native American Rights Fund
David Bernhardt (Land into Trust) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlNavajo Nation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm by Unknown
David Bernhardt (Land into Trust) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlNavajo Nation v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2019, Warby J gave Judgment in the case of Triplark Limited v  Northwood Hall (Freehold) Limited (2) Philip Whale (3) David Wismayer [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
Therefore, it expired on February 3, 2009, long before the plaintiffs brought the action in New York state court in December 2022. [read post]