Search for: "Doe Corporation" Results 1181 - 1200 of 51,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 6:57 am by Steven Cohen
Roger Levy (Corporate Governance Expert Witness) to provide testimony. [read post]
26 May 2014, 6:36 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Cal. 5/14/2014), the Court held that the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 USC 3730(h), does not permit a relator or plaintiff that is a corporation to sue for retaliation: only an individual "employee, contractor, or agent" may bring a claim that he or she was "discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment because of lawful acts" done by the individual in furtherance of an… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Francis Pileggi
No Per Se Duty to Minimize Corporate Taxes In connection with the demand futility analysis and providing helpful examples of successfully establishing particularized facts that raise reasonable doubt that directors are disinterested and independent, such as when a director sits on both sides of a transaction or derives a benefit from a transaction that is not shared by the corporation or all stockholders generally, the Court observed that:  “there is no… [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 9:32 am
Check out the Metropolitan Corporate Counsel magazine interview with Lynne Z. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:16 am by James O. Birr, III, Esq.
  Though that testimony is not tantamount to a judicial admission, it does not mean a party can simply repudiate his/her prior testimony at trial. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:16 am by James O. Birr, III, Esq.
  Though that testimony is not tantamount to a judicial admission, it does not mean a party can simply repudiate his/her prior testimony at trial. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:04 am by Geoff Schweller
’s failure to properly protect and incentivize corporate whistleblowers. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:48 am by Erin E. Dardis
” As the corporation’s “voice,” the deponent does not testify about matters within his or her personal knowledge, but rather speaks for the corporation. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
The Court agreed with SHI’s second argument, stating that “corporate veil-piercing principles can apply to a limited partnership; however, the record does not support veil piercing in this case. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
The Court agreed with SHI’s second argument, stating that “corporate veil-piercing principles can apply to a limited partnership; however, the record does not support veil piercing in this case. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by Mavrick Law Firm
However, if the buyer is merely purchasing corporate assets from a dissolved corporation, the buyer may not be entitled to enforce the dissolved corporation’s non-compete agreements. [read post]
While the business judgment rule allows for “judicial deference to business decisions[,]” this rule does not apply where the conduct advances the director’s or officer’s own self-interest or the interests of any party other than the corporation.. [read post]
” The court reasoned this case does not have those circumstances because there was no evidence the corporation was planning to liquidate assets prior to the dissolution claim. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:34 am by Joe Consumer
In 1994, a powerful new corporate crime fighter appeared on the scene and his name was Crackers the Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:34 am by Joe Consumer
In 1994, a powerful new corporate crime fighter appeared on the scene and his name was Crackers the Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 6:20 pm
Dissolving a business does not absolve the owners of their personal liability for the sales tax due. [read post]