Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) In The New  Republic Purdue University political science professor Frank J. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
However, the Van Breda test does not fit well with internet-based libel actions. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  The first one is entitled, “Aydin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[v]Another element that may cause some misunderstanding of the priorities in a layoff -- the individual may have been appointed to what has been designated a “permanent position” or appointed to position designated a “temporary position. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:44 am
In short, does the court have "subject matter jurisdiction"? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Prosser’s 4th edition does not mention enterprise liability at all. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:59 am by Bruce Boyden
Prosser's 4th edition does not mention enterprise liability at all. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
., Pace Law School No Bitin’ Allowed: A Hip-Hop Copying Paradigm for All of Us Commentator: Greg Lastowka, Rutgers School of Law, Camden Mark Bartholomew, University at Buffalo Law School A Right Is Born: Celebrity, Property, and Postmodern Lawmaking Commentator: Jason Mazzone, Brooklyn Law School Oskar Liivak, Cornell Law School Incentives & Indecision in Patent Law Commentator: Clarisa Long, Columbia Law School Amy Kapczynski, UC Berkeley Law School (visiting, Yale Law… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am by SOIssues
Volungus, 595 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:21 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Columbia Spectator, the student newspaper of Columbia University has a story about  Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In In effort to get Supreme Court to hear Columbia eminent domain case, AY precedent and New York practices seen as outliers favoring condemnors, Oder writes: The Columbia University expansion case should reach a reckoning this week at the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Readers may recall this tactic was tried last year in the case of Sigram Schindler Beteilungsgesellschaft mbH v. [read post]