Search for: "Does 1 - 47"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 4,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
** This decision was sustained administrative appeal.Plaintiff then initiated a CPLR Article 78 action seeking a court order compelling DOE (1) to produce such records pursuant to FOIL and (2) for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
No matter how much someone might wish it.The EO attempts to enlist the Secretary of Commerce and Attorney General to draft a rulemaking petition with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that asks it that independent agency to interpret 47 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
” 47 U.S.C. 230(a)(3). [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
” 47 U.S.C. 230(a)(3). [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:36 pm
The Executive Order does a number of things. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:25 pm
To see why, let’s take a deeper look at its incorrect reading of Section 230 (47 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:11 pm
In an earlier post, I talked about the big picture of 47 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:44 am
A few observations: [1.] [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
This analysis addresses two issues: (1) whether the French DST is a tax covered in Article 1 of the Treaty; and (2) whether the French DST violates the non-discrimination clause of the Treaty by disproportionately targeting Irish companies while leaving most French companies exempted from the tax. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
” 2Footnote(s):1 Copies may be obtained from: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:59 am
At points 45 to 49, he considered that a writ of execution is not an ‘authentic instrument’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of that Regulation because the writ does not concern an uncontested claim. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:19 pm
1. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:47 pm
Total longshot.Now, between you and me, while I'm extremely happy that the opinion comes out the way it does, which I believe to be the right result, I suspect that CashCall will in fact prevail on remand. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:24 am
Supp. 3d 1240, 1246-47 (M.D. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:24 am
Supp. 3d 1240, 1246-47 (M.D. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:24 am
Supp. 3d 1240, 1246-47 (M.D. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:24 am
Supp. 3d 1240, 1246-47 (M.D. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:24 am
Supp. 3d 1240, 1246-47 (M.D. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am
The CJEU’s technical perspective in paragraph 47 does not sufficiently appreciate the factual decision making of the certifier. [read post]
