Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 3:46 pm
” What does that mean for drivers? [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:15 pm
On May 1, 2014, FTC Chief Administrative Law Judge D. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:26 pm
Does this require something like a clawback of data shared with third parties? [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The GC then proceeded to set out two cumulative conditions that must be satisfied for establishing a likelihood of confusion: 1) it is necessary to establish that there is a series of earlier registrations; 2) the mark applied for must not only be similar to the marks belonging to the series, but also display characteristics capable of associating it with the series. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:45 am
§ 100905(a)(1). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
Pangburn, 983 F.2d 449, 453-54 (2d Cir. 1993).) [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:14 pm
How on earth does that case not get charged? [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The application documents filed with the EPO contained, apart from the claims and the abstract, description pages 1 to 15 and a set of drawings, comprising Fig. 1 to Fig. 12. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The right of priority has the effect that the date of priority counts as the date of filing of the European patent application for the purposes of A 54, paragraphs 2 and 3, and A 60, paragraph 2. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
B.J. 1. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
It does not describe any other application. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm
Super. [47,] 54 [(1995)]). [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:55 pm
Does this mean the members might lose control over dues? [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:45 am
The court concluded that section 19(2) was contrary to section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which says: 15(1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:52 pm
Robert and Susan McWilliam appealed to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal under Section 48(1) and 54(1) of the Drainage Act (The "Act") from the Engineer's Report (the "Report") dated July 22, 2010, and from a decision of the Court of Revision dated September 1, 2010. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:07 pm
The Ministry of Justice does now publish statistics on privacy injunctions which form part of the Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly and are published every 6 months. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:14 am
But it does appear local policymakers are in tune with their constituencies. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:22 am
Google, Inc.., 676 F.3d 144, 153-54 (4th Circuit 2012)Looking to the six non-exhaustive factors of Section 43(c)(1)(B)(1), the court found insufficient similarity between the marks, no evidence that Defendant intended to associate with the SWATCH mark, and no actual association between the marks. [read post]
Judicial Statistics, 2015: Issued defamation claims down by 40%, the second lowest number since 1992
4 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
The Ministry of Justice does now publish statistics on privacy injunctions which now form part of the Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly and are published every 6 months. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm
The Rutherfords’ claim was article 14 disability discrimination by way of Art 1 Prot 1 rights. [read post]
