Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Robert Sharp, also of English PEN, has dissected some of the detail here and here. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:19 am
" The North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled in Huang v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Related posts:Gambazzi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
D’Amico Dry Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
D’Amico Dry Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:05 pm
Updating this entry from earlier today on the Indiana Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:33 am
The English Court made an order enforcing the award. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Mr Bleuse, a German national who worked for a UK company throughout Europe (but not in the UK) under an English law contract, was unable to bring claims for unfair dismissal or unlawful deduction of wages because he could not satisfy the tests set out in Lawson v Serco – that is to say his employment did not have sufficient connection to the UK; his English law contract was not enough for these purposes. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
To add more to the plain words of statute, to afford those words a meaning other than what ordinary English requires, seems to this Court to be unnecessary. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 1:10 pm
The case is Mamancochet Mining Limited v Aegis Managing Agency Limited and Others. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 6:34 am
The message from both the English and the German courts was that resolution authorities must adhere strictly to the terms of the BRRD; otherwise, measures that they take in relation to distressed banks may not be given effect in other Member States. [read post]
