Search for: "Ex Parte Clear" Results 1181 - 1200 of 5,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by Derek T. Muller
It’s just to say—and I’m not a part of any of these discussions! [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Jack Goldsmith, Nathaniel Sobel
In May 2019, Attorney General William Barr tapped Connecticut’s U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:32 pm by Sanjana
On Page 28, the CRA notes the company is – as part of civic engagement practices – putting out election day reminders. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Joanna Herzik
The client insists on payment being deposited and a check cut the next day which the attorney anticipates will be before the funds have cleared or been deposited in the account, although the attorney did not deposit the check to find out. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:43 pm by Scott McKeown
  In addition to raising many of the same issues as the government, Smith & Nephew explained that the Federal Circuit’s ruling has already been extended to apply to other types of PTO activity, such as ex parte and inter partes reexamination. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
GORSUCH, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which THOMAS, J., joined as to Part II. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
” (It is far from clear that Thuraissigiam’s counsel intended to disclaim reliance on an argument that the writ of habeas corpus may have expanded since 1789.) [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
The court denied granting the habeas writ on the merits in part because the petitioners wanted relief beyond simple release and instead wanted the United States to protect them from criminal prosecution in Iraq. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:48 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern (Lubberger Lehment )
In May 2020, the Regional Court of Hamburg granted an ex-parte injunction which, after an oral hearing, it confirmed in a reasoned judgment (19.05.2020, 406 HKO 65/20). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
  The majority also cites a 1943 Supreme Court case—Ex parte Republic of Peru, 318 U.S. 578 (1943)—but that’s inapposite, too, as Judge Wilkins explains (dissent pp. 8-9 n.2):  The Court there decided that the petitioning party, the Republic of Peru, had a basis for immediate relief to remedy its own injury.Thus Judge Wilkins is right (p.8):  “The majority cites no cases in which a court has concluded that a petitioner has satisfied her burden… [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm by David Kopel
If former slave states could prohibit freedmen from assembling, from contracting their labor freely, from traveling, or from defending themselves, then they could be reduced to servitude by the Black Codes being adopted in the ex-confederate states. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
The purpose of this paragraph is to limit ex parte communications with the assessor. 10. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 5:12 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
 (Presumably Lamberth might also hold a classified, ex parte hearing, where the government can present its classified evidence, but he hasn’t yet announced that.) [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
The U.S. government filed a civil suit on June 17 against former National Security Adviser John Bolton. [read post]