Search for: "Ex parte Cross" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2009, 8:45 pm
But for the most part we maintain our distance from one another and live our lives without contact. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:00 am by Ken Watkin
Professors Ohlin and May present a detailed and thoughtful discussion concerning the difficulties of directly applying “human rights law in armed conflict, so that human rights law and IHL cross-fertilize each other, producing a humanizing effect…. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Instead, Rule 30(c)(1) says that examination and cross-examination should "proceed as they would at trial" -- we knew we had read that somewhere! [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:38 am by Florian Mueller
The following chart shows the duration (number of months on the X axis) of eight disputes (with separate bars for the U.S. and ex-U.S. parts of Apple v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 12:26 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If the tax system did not use marginal rates, it would create perverse "cliff effects" that would discourage a person from crossing a bracket barrier. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Sixth Circuit: Which has the effect of increasing the punishment attached to their convictions, and so violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 6:02 pm by Robert Chesney
” In this case, we plainly have an activity of the U.S. government intended to influence both political and military conditions abroad, so the first part of the definition is satisfied. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:31 pm by Robert Chesney
Could the scenarios listed in 1621(a) also be a justification for a cross-domain response, of the traditional military variety? [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Paris is a city of neighborhoods and the great thing about the Paris metro is that you can descend in on e part of the city and emerge just moments later in a completely different neighborhood. [read post]
” The U.S. withdrawal from the treaty ex post facto has no impact on the ICJ ruling, however. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am by Anubha Sinha
 Next I wrote about a local Court in Gurgaon granting an ex-parte interim injunction against Viacom 18 Pvt Ltd., restraining them from using the trademark ‘Nautanki’ and the accompanying logo last week. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm by John Ross
Officer reports her ex for sexually abusing her daughter; ex then files bogus, now-expunged internal affairs complaint. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.BACKGROUNDIn 1999, the Gregorys refinanced a house they owned in San Antonio. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:32 am by Jan von Hein
Yet closer scrutiny reveals that some parts of the underlying fundament have changed since GAT ./. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Reyeros, No. 06-1485, 06-1486 Convictions and sentence for conspiracy to import cocaine are affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that defendant knew the specific object of the conspiracy; 2) documents in the possession of a foreign sovereign and never seen by the government were not subject to Brady or Jencks disclosure; 3) there was no individual or cumulative unfairness in the court's rulings on a motion to sever, evidentiary questions, or alleged prosecutorial misconduct; and 4)… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
Go to CPE Treaty Project Page: HERE.This Part 14 focuses on Article 15 of the Zero Draft (Final Provisions); the comments of China and Palestinian delegations are worth reviewing carefully. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The change in control or ownership solves ex ante contracting problems and ex post incentive problems. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Cyberleagle
 It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the search for this will o’the wisp is ultimately a matter of impression – the more so, the further the evaluation strays from red lines that cannot be crossed towards an overall multifactorial assessment, the result of which depends on how much weight the court chooses to give to each factor. [read post]