Search for: "FRANCISCO B" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Alѕо, аѕ уоu nоtеd, thеу damage уоur сrеdіt score and prevent уоu frоm potentially bоrrоwіng tо ѕаtіѕfу the lіаbіlіtу. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
B+ subgroup asks for commentsThe UK Intellectual Property Office's CEO, John Alty CB is chairman of a group of representatives from countries and organisations known as Group B+ which focuses on patent harmonisation. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
” The hallmark of 2(b) - unlawful appropriation- is that the works share substantial similarities. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 540 [city did not prematurely approve community center/affordable housing project]; Taxpayers for Accountable School Board Spending v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:21 pm
Though it remains the law, the §10(b) private right should not be extended beyond its present boundaries. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am by Dennis Crouch
The following is a really wonderful Guest Post from UC San Francisco Law School Professor Jeffrey Lefstin focusing on a recent ITC decision finding a claimed drill bit abstract because of its functional limitations. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
Indeed, in a December 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, City & Cty. of San Francisco v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:04 pm by admin
 Paris, for example, ineffectually bans short-term rentals; San Francisco prevents owners from reoccupying their own flats. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent prosecution… [read post]
  Notably, the San Francisco Department of Public Health (“SFDPH”) has taken the position, in its updated Order and FAQs, that its own masking rules remain in place—including exemptions for “stable cohorts” with 100% vaccination rates, among other criteria. [read post]