Search for: "Grant v. Commonwealth"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm
Mitts’ death sentence and granted certiorari to consider the question of whether certain jury instructions were valid when Mr. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am
In The Commonwealth v Sterling Nicholas Duty Free [1972] HCA 19; (1972) 126 CLR 297 at 305 Barwick CJ said: The jurisdiction to make a declaratory order without consequential relief is a large and most useful jurisdiction. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:19 pm
In F v Contract Service Provider to a Commonwealth Government Agency [2011] PrivCmrA 6 the Commissioner found that the collection of the complainant’s information by the CSP was necessary for a lawful purpose directly related to the CSPs functions or activities. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Union v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 11:12 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Finally, when arguments such as this come up, I like to go back to the opinion by Judge Leon Higginbotham, one of the earliest Black district judges, then on the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (and later the Third Circuit) in Commonwealth of Pa. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:19 am
The facts in Fleming v Marshall [2011] NSWCA 86 were complex and multi-jurisdictional. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
Apparently, as the case was being served the Plaintiff’s returned to Court and were granted relief to file an Amended Complaint. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm
The case is Branham v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
The Supreme Judicial Court granted an application for direct appellate review. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
The major case in 1981, Cosner v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
Title: M.B.Z. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
The Court granted cert. in Judulang v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
Title: Jones v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
