Search for: "Graves v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
  The Commission argues that the ATS may be applied “where the defendant is a United States national or the conduct implicates United States security interests of fundamental importance” and also to “a narrow category of the most grave international law violations involving conduct of universal concern so long as the ATS claimant demonstrates that those States with a nexus to the case are unwilling or unable to provide a forum and no… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns of… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States District of Idaho explained the grave risks to health a pregnant woman faces: Pregnant women in Idaho routinely arrive at emergency rooms experiencing severe complications. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:50 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here is a post dated today:Brain Dysfunction and Capital Mitigation Loyd v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:32 am by David Edelstein
This is one area where the Supreme Court’s rewrite of Confrontation Clause jurisprudence in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:50 pm
In my opinion, it could constitute a grave defect in the electoral process in respect of any contemplated meeting. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:04 am
Supreme Court" in Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm by nflatow
As Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in his dissent in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]