Search for: "Havens v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
It’s also a topic that we haven’t addressed before – not an easy thing to find after almost three years and over 1,000 posts. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
It’s also a topic that we haven’t addressed before – not an easy thing to find after almost three years and over 1,000 posts. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
It’s also a topic that we haven’t addressed before – not an easy thing to find after almost three years and over 1,000 posts. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:10 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The legislative history of Section 230 refers specifically to a New York state case — Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:55 am by Bexis
  We haven’t heard that one before.But apparently it’s a topic that has some currency in the Lone Star State. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7183, and – so far as we can tell (the parties haven’t gotten back to us yet), Eaton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 2:05 pm
Reports of the ruling, which are often more frustrating than illuminating, can be found here, here, here, and here.Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a copy of the actual ruling online.Based on the reports, it appears that Judge Folsom ruled that the defense had presented sufficient evidence of unlawful command influence for the burden to shift to the government to disprove the existence of unlawful command influence beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
 That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Marilyn Stowe
Too many cohabiting couples haven’t a clue about the potential implications. [read post]