Search for: "Hoffman v. Hoffman"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 5:07 am
Thomas v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
I've also put up a lightly revised draft of Executing Retributivism, a paper I mentioned a few weeks ago about the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Panetti v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am
Hoffman & Robert C. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 6:55 am
Sarah Burns v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:30 pm
The first flash point between the UK and the newly empowered court is likely to be its failure to implement the 2005 decision in Hirst v The UK (No.2). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Wiser v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
There will always be a penumbral area where views may reasonably differ, said Lord Hoffman and Dame Arden.In his opinion in Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited, Lord Hoffmann said that, although the requirement that the initial computation must give a true and fair view involves the application of a legal standard, the courts are guided as to its content by the expert opinions of accountants as to what the best current accounting… [read post]
7 May 2018, 8:00 am
Frosch v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Lord Hoffman (left, of Pinochet fame) reasoned that it was for Parliament to decide which international offenses should be made prosecutable in domestic courts and that the courts no longer possessed any residual power to create new offenses in the event of statutory gaps, no matter how pressing the public interest. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:30 am
Espinal v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:00 am
William Harris, as Administrator of the Estate of Lillie Michelet v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:05 am
In Florida this is called the Undertakers Doctrine as laid out in the case of Wallace v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Rigoli v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
Ward v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:00 am
Bruno, et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:07 am
Thomas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:34 am
Hoffman-LaRoche, in which the court ruled that Michigan resident Howe has no basis of claim in NJ. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
