Search for: "Hong v. Hong"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 6:52 am
UOI (Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: Patent bar, doctors face off in Prometheus v Mayo (The Prior Art) US Copyright Rights owners taking on small victims – Warner Music vs ‘Keyboard Cat’ YouTube clip; DC Comics vs John Stacks over figurines; Frank Gaylord vs postal service over art image on stamps (1709 Copyright Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Colorado: Republishing third party rankings in marketing material might be copyright/trade mark… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:47 am
X took no steps to establish significant ties in Hong Kong that would show that he intended to live there permanently. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
The latter have minor significance here given the poor drafting and the Mitsui principle of construction [".. the poorer the quality of the drafting, the less willing the court should be to be driven by semantic niceties to attribute to the parties an improbable and unbusinesslike intention, if the language used, whatever it may lack in precision, is reasonably capable of an interpretation which attributes to the parties an intention to make provision for contingencies inherent in the work… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
In other words, this case finds, in effect, both substantive due process and equal protection violations, going one step further than the US Supreme Court went in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:05 pm
It was quite exciting to read the opinion by Chief Justice Ajit Prakash Shah in the decision in Naz Foundation v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
In Research in Motion Limited v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:15 pm
Hong, San Mateo County Superior Court, Case No. 451657, the Hon. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:13 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Apple & Eve, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:17 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
Hong Kong Sauce Maker Awarded $82,964 Treble Damages for Counterfeiting of Its Hoisin Sauce
Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:36 am
" Croll v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:57 am
Another case to watch: Pietrylo v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) Section 230 immunity: Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(IPEG) EU gives go ahead for Canada trade talks (Michael Geist) Europe not represented among the world’s most innovative cities according to Business Week survey (Innovationpartners) EPO Applicant Panel Survey 2008 results published (BLOG@IP::JUR) Germany Chinese company Wangzhihe reclaims brand in Germany (Managing Intellectual Property) Hong Kong Hong Kong proposes copyright quotas (Managing Intellectual Property) Hungary Metropolitan… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:19 pm
The case is Van Alstyne v. [read post]
