Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 7,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 8:03 am
Chicago Housing Authority v. 3721-3723 Elston Condominium and Tera Healy, 2014 IL App (1st) 130626-U (May 23, 2014). [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:10 pm
Godagam & Edirisinghe v Hanson. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:54 pm
In the recent appellate case of United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
At the close of the prosecution case the Defendant's Counsel made a submission of no case to answer on counts 2 and 3. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
At the close of the prosecution case the Defendant's Counsel made a submission of no case to answer on counts 2 and 3. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
EFF also submitted an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case Octane Fitness v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
After opening arguments and at the close of Carroll's testimony, the Carmans moved for a directed verdict based on Florida v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:53 pm
As noted in [State v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
Thorneloe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
The Supreme Court recently addressed this very issue in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
Americans would have an expanded social contract that now included (close to) universal health insurance. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:46 am
Supreme Court said a few years ago in Clark County Schools v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:31 am
Such a claim was considered in Barrick v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In Rasul v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Nathan and Singh closed on the house the same day. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:19 pm
In Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:06 am
In Samlal v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
As we’ve previously noted, the House of Lords in Doherty did little to actually make things clear, so Hillingdon v Collins is an important judgment. [read post]
