Search for: "House v. House" Results 1181 - 1200 of 41,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
   According to evidence provided in the case of Nzolameso v City of Westminster, in October 2013 48% of the temporary accommodation provided Westminster was outside the borough. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:23 am by Broc Romanek
John Fund Decision As we await the important fraud standard decision of Halliburton v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:34 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The general constitutional rule for effective dates in Oklahoma is 90 days from the adjournment of the session (§V-58), which is scheduled to be no later than May 29. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, the UT did not rely on Lord Sumption’s comments in Coventry v Lawrence [2014] UKSC 13 and so any dispute about whether or not it had been correct to do so does not arise. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:02 pm by Steve Lubet
I will grant that Article V appears to the contrary, using "both" to describe separate votes: The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution. . . . [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
Eric Easton, University of Baltimore, School of Law, is publishing "A House Divided: Earl Caldwell, the New York Times, and the Quest for a Testimonial Privilege," in the Utah Law Review. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:10 am
We've extensively covered the various fair-housing complaints against Craiglist (Aug. 10, 2005; Feb. 9, Feb. 20, Mar. 6, Jun. 28, Dec. 1, 2006) for that service's hosting ads for housing and roommates that fall afoul of non-discrimination laws—it's technically illegal for a woman to say that she's looking for another woman to share her apartment with, much less a co-religionist or someone without kids. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:09 pm
Thanks to Dwight Merriam for the heads-up on "Driven Out," the upcoming New York Times book review of Little Pink House - A True Story of Defiance and Courage, about the infamous 2005 eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]