Search for: "IN RE GRANT" Results 1181 - 1200 of 37,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by rainey Reitman
This is a dangerous expansion of powers, and not something to be granted without any public debate on the topic. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Wang granted (in part) the defendant’s motion for sanctions for the plaintiff’s delay in producing a copy of a journal she kept while employed by the defendant and for her failure to produce the original copy of the journal by granting leave to re-open the plaintiff’s deposition for an additional two hours to examine the plaintiff about the journal and...Read the whole entry... [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Q: So you’re reading blog posts after cert grants? [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm by Matthew Nelson
The Michigan Supreme Court took substantive action in six cases: In re P.M. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:19 pm
"Section 6: post-grant proceduresPart (a) amends re-examination procedures.Part (e) creates post-grant review proceduresCancellation petition must be filed not later than 12 months after patent grant {"first window") OR (likelihood of economic harm or there is allegation of infringement or permission from patentee)("second window")Preponderance of evidence evidentiary standard. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:26 am by Bob Fraser
The tenant proceeded to bring an application that the landlord had unreasonably withheld its consent in order to benefit itself by re-leasing the premises. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
The agency published new Federal Register notices on November 4 offering guidance on eligibility to re-register, fees, and filing procedures. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:25 am by Megan Geuss
"They’re trying to freeze things to make sure nothing happens they don’t want to have happen, so any regulations going forward, contracts, grants, hires, they want to make sure to look at them first," Ebell said. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:25 am by Megan Geuss
"They’re trying to freeze things to make sure nothing happens they don’t want to have happen, so any regulations going forward, contracts, grants, hires, they want to make sure to look at them first," Ebell said. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 10:01 pm
****UPDATE2Of David's second comment, declarations in re-examination evoke to me the silly arguments made by FTCR and PubPat in the re-examinations of three WARF patents in the embryonic stem cell area. [read post]