Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268, 1273 (D.Kan.2005), rev'd and remanded on other grounds, 197 Fed.Appx. 749, 753 (10th Cir. 2006). [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
But this is a room that could be reasonably used by anyone under Reg B13 (5): a. a couple (within the meaning of Part 7 of the Act); b. a person who is not a child; ba. a child who cannot share a bedroom; c. two children of the same sex; d. two children who are less than 10 years old; e. a child. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
id=a5cdb7a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2014] CSOH 169 CA73/13OPINION OF LORD DOHERTY In the cause (FIRST) A LIMITED (SECOND) B LIMITED (THIRD) C LIMITED (FOURTH) D LIMITED (FIFTH) E LIMITED Pursuers;against F Defender:Pursuers: Sandison QC, Watt; Shepherd & WedderburnDefender: Party Litigant27 November 2014Introduction[1] The defender was employed by the fifth pursuer between 1 September… [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
§ 13–705(D). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
Adam B. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 11:18 am
The King's agitated confrontation with his supportive adult child didn’t take place in a VA parking lot. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Jump to: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W A Back to top Acute care – A high level of care provided to a patient for a medical condition or illness that a patient is likely to recover from. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:41 am
At the end of the event, Law School Dean Joseph D. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Defense Attorneys: Joshua B. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
I’d like to update my table to show better stats for placement orders made so if anyone can send me a link to them I will do so. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
The Court must examine the following issues: (a) What caused the breakdown in the parent-child relationship; (b) Whether it is the child that has alienated the non-custodial parent; and (c) Whether the non-custodial parent was consulted on the child’s choice of college. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
On remand, the State advanced various arguments in an effort to show that Amendment 2 was narrowly tailored to serve compelling interests, but the trial court found none sufficient. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am
Whereas the ECJ is looking for the place where the alleged victim has its centre of interests, the FSC requires that the forum state be the place where the diverging interests of both parties collide. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:34 am
Student Loan Interest Deduction. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
That case follows hot on the heels of Re B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 33. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Code §2252(a)(2) and (b)(1), and one count of possessing child pornography . . . in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:53 am
See DRL 77–d. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
Instead, they allowed the Bible Believers to proceed until the threat of “violent retaliation and physical injury” became too great, at which point they “discharge[d] their duty of preserving the peace by … by removing the speaker[s] for [their] own protection. [read post]
