Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 1181 - 1200 of 18,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In the case of R v Golds [2016] UKSC 61, the Supreme Justices were tasked with determining what amounted to a “substantial” mental impairment in the context of the defence of diminished responsibility. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Graham v Florida No. 08–7412. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:35 am
Democratic members of Congress are planning to re-introduce legislation that would overturn the February, 2008 Supreme Court decision in Reigel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in one of the key employment cases it will hear this term—Vance v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) In a dissenting opinion filed Monday in Glossip v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Karen Gullo
  Related Issues: PrivacyNational Security LettersNSA SpyingRelated Cases: Twitter v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
I’m not quite sure what words we’re going to give the District Court if you’re to prevail. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 8:13 am
  In re Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation: Susan Rindfleisch and Warren Rindfleisch v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
  It may well have been that, forty years ago, most trial lawyers would have said that peremptory challenges are essential to justice. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:42 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
That much was driven home, it seems, during today’s oral arguments in the case City of Ontario v. [read post]