Search for: "In re Austin M." Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am by Burt Neuborne
  But I’m afraid that train has left the station. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
Therefore, it’s not uncommon for people to say they’re getting divorced, and then decide to stay together. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If people identify that design with lawmakers in Austin, isn’t there an Establishment Clause problem? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:03 am by Steve Hall
• Did they have an obligation to step forward and do a re-evaluation? [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:07 pm by Deborah Schander
The History of Love by Nicole Krauss I’m not going to describe it. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent working paper, Tara M. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
" Chuck Lindell writes, "Special court throws out Keller rebuke, ending case," for the Austin American-Statesman. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
"If it had dropped another 300 points, then some of the companies might have had second thoughts about some of the M&A deals we're working on," says Fenwick & West's Daniel Winnike. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
 Part 1 of this series ended by suggesting that talk about crime in the media, and other such ‘vivid tales’, was a form of moral recycling whereby dirt was dug up, laundered clean of damaging social and political implications, and then re-presented as the triumph of good over evil and the futility of dissent and conflict. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
(If you're interested in the arguments about the 2006 extension of section 5, there's lots of good scholarship out there, plus a masterful opinion from the D.D.C. last week in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:00 am
I’m a believer that a little inspiration and education can go a long way. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
(I’m going to have a lot more to say about Justice Barrett’s procedural argument in tomorrow’s bonus issue.) [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Mandelman
This article originally ran in December 0f 2009, but I’m reposting it because maybe it will be read by someone who will find it even the least bit interesting. [read post]