Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
      MOOTNESS FEES The Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 decision in In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As of January 5, 2018, Francis was being held by ICE at the Bergen County Jail in Hackensack, New Jersey, pending removal proceedings in Immigration Court.The Mootness ExceptionThe verified petition, dated December 11, 2017, requested the immediate release of Francis and a declaration that his detention was [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
On March 4, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a Class Action Settlement in In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Litigation, No. [read post]
(D068185; 4  Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:54 am by Danielle Parker
On May 4, 2021, the SEC adopted new marketing rules for investment advisers. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:48 pm by Apsosredesign
Rights4Girls.org found girls are 4 times more likely than boys to be abused. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
The Oct. 5, 1973, Brief for the United States in In re Agnew. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Keeps Trump on Ballot, Rejects Colorado Voter Challenge MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 3/4/2024 The Supreme Court restored Donald Trump to the Colorado primary ballot, ruling the state lacked authority to disqualify him after his actions during the attack on the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
This action is part of a multi-year enforcement initiative to improve compliance with the Construction General Permit. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
 79(3), (4) and (7), 1993 CanLII 119 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839, at p. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]