Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 30,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
But if you're wondering how to get out of a traffic ticket, you're on your own. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:44 am
We’ve got wonderful judges on our federal bench who know what they’re doing when it comes to trademark law. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:55 am
In re Jack B. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
See In re Fox, 105 USPQ2d 1247, 1252 (Fed. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:44 am
" In re Müller, Durrer & Müller, Schuhateliers, Serial No. 79028161 (January 22, 2010) [not precedential].Applicant argued that the additional "E" in the applied-for mark "impacts the way the mark is pronounced. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
We're not going to get into personal details (we'll leave that to Mark), but after reading his post - which would be hilarious if it weren't so accurate - we'd have to say that we've done marginally better on the practice development side and marginally worse on the press appearance side (we haven't been on TV).Thanks Mark - we think. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
In re American Branding Agency, Corporation, Serial No. 88683570 (September 29, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 2:55 am
In re Mathis Ventures LLC, Serial No. 86849413 (September 8, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 2:50 am
In re John M. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 4:57 am
I was sitting on the couch, rifling through the channles when I happened to see Mark Cuban speaking to the Online News Association Conference. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
In re Leonhardt, Serial No. 78666879 (November 13, 2008) [precedential].Applicant's counsel lamely argued that the mark is merely suggestive, but Examining Attorney Yat-sye I. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:00 am
Va. 1992) and In re Dell, Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725 (TTAB 2004), a webpage may be an acceptable specimen for a product if it (1) includes a picture of the relevant goods; (2) shows the mark associated with the goods; and (3) contains the necessary ordering information. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:17 pm
And if you’re thinking about asking questions about your mark, you’re actually thinking about advocating for yourself. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:52 am
Applicant argued that the disclaimed terms are of less significance and the design elements in the marks are sufficient to distinguish them.]In re Beavertail Products, LLC, Serial No. 88197106 (October 23, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:33 am
The services overlapped, but are the marks too close? [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" In re Aquitaine Wine, 126 USPQ2d at 1188. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 8:01 am
See also In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1207, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1689 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 9:37 am
Cir. 2012); In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1363, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:49 pm
""We're relieved that no one will have to relive the pain of this event again in a court setting," said Sheriff Jeff Dawsy, via phone from out of state. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:49 pm
Lawyer Mark Caruso was among those representing Albuquerque resident Josie Garcia in that case. [read post]
