Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 1181 - 1200 of 5,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2019, 6:50 am
As readers know, the adoption of the EU Trade Secrets Directive has required Member States to amend their own laws in order to transpose this new piece of EU legislation into their own systems. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:32 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
The subject matters of the Open Meeting will be: Item 1: The Commission will consider whether to adopt new rules and rule amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Texas Dep't of Protective and Regulatory Servs., No. 06-20673 "Summary judgment for various governmental entities and employees accused of performing unconstitutional child abuse investigations is affirmed where: 1) certain Fourth Amendment claims resulting from the seizures of plaintiffs' children failed because the exigent-circumstances doctrine applied; 2) where there were Fourth Amendment violations, individual defendants were entitled to qualified… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
" To support that statement, footnote 1 cites the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Still, here’s my rough sense of the matter: a. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
Andrew concludes that 2019 was not the easiest year for patentees.The starters (1) Added matter and summary judgment In Novartis v Dr Reddy's [2019] EWHC 92, the UK judge (Birss J) ruled on added matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
   Lobbyists would have to invest at least $1 million in a pooled Congressional incumbents’ campaign fund and prove how the lobbyist’s investment will create at least 10 jobs for US workers. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:08 am by Sam E. Antar
" On March 1, 2002, Business 2.0 Magazine reporter Owen Thomas asked, "Are you profitable? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:11 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  In an initial examination, the examiner applies the broadest reasonable construction, and if claims are rejected, the applicant can amend them as a matter of right. [read post]