Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 5,932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 4:02 pm
Originally, an employee or dependent was required, among other things, to have experienced a loss of coverage as a result of an involuntary termination occurring between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 to qualify for coverage under the COBRA premium subsidy rules as “assistance eligible individual for up to 9 months. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
November 10 - 14, 2008. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
That matters a lot because it deprives Canadians of the cohort of material that would have entered the public domain on January 1, 2023 from the creators who died in 1972. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
There were no major amendments to these rules during the revision of the EPC; R 152(11) corresponds to R 101(9) EPC 1973.[2.2] The “Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations” (OJ EPO special edition 3/2007, 128, hereinafter referred to as “DecFilAuth”) was based on R 152(1). [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
A test’s SEM is a statistical fact, a reflection of the inherent imprecision of the test itself” (10). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Patent relative: only the top 10% get into the contest at all. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
(1) The trial court retained jurisdiction to amend a sentence until the time for notice of appeal expires; (2) Amendment of a drug trafficking sentence to include the maximum term that corresponds to the mandatory minimum sentence was a clerical correction that the trial court could make outside of the defendant’s presence. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
However, this general rule does not apply when the procedural, so the rules above may well apply to proceedings pending as of September 1, 2011. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:52 pm
All contempt proceedings brought pursuant to P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) shall be subject to any rules or guidelines established by the Supreme Court to guarantee the prompt disposition of criminal matters. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
**http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/10/08/08greenwire-fight-brewing-over-possible-rider-to-weaken-ai-29131.htmlOctober 8, 2009Fight Brewing Over Possible Rider to Weaken Air Pollution Regs for Ships By ROBIN BRAVENDER of GreenwireClean air advocates are girding for a battle over a possible amendment to the annual U.S. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am
As to auxiliary requests 5 to 10 and 13 to 23, the board noted that claim 1 of each request, although amended, did not comply with Article 123(2) EPC for essentially the same reasons as claim 1 of the main request.XI. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Hobbs (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-9647 Issue(s): Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was 14 at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
Whether the harassment offence in section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 should be amended to incorporate a specific reference to cyber-harassment, including indirect cyber-harassment (…); 2. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
An amended complaint was filed, adding JCM as a defendant and alleging that JCG and JCM are liable for fraud under Section 10(b), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “34 Act)” and related SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm
Similarly, the IRS Is moving ahead with the oversight rules for requiring "preparer tax identification numbers" (PTINs) for all preparers on federal returns starting Jan. 1. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
The Appellate Division found defendant's contention to be without merit because that court rule does not apply to a QDRO, which is merely a mechanism to effectuate payment of a party's share in a retirement plan. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
I’ll add time-stamps at the beginning of each comment so you know when I added it. 10:02: In a 5-4 ruling by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution requires states to provide for same-sex marriage. 10:09: The opinion is here. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 7:22 am
Wagner, No. 1-06-3427 (Ill. 1st May 15, 2009). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 pm
Therefore we find that he violated Rule 3.3(a)(1). [read post]
