Search for: "JOHN BARRETT"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
It seems likely that if and when President Trump is put on trial in the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors, his lawyers will argue that the president was exercising his First Amendment right to free speech in the weeks after the election—and, as a consequence, his words cannot form the basis of an impeachable offense. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
The only issue that gets his dander up is any perceived intrusion about the Judiciary (read John Roberts's) powers. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, for instance, is only in her late forties. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Barrett quoted an earlier decision that described Heller’s declaration as a “passing reference. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
In April 2021, the court – now with a 6-3 conservative majority after the addition of Justice Amy Coney Barrett – did just that when it agreed to hear New York State Rifle & Pistol. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
And then there’s Barrett v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett asks. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined the Roberts opinion. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Her invocation of “waiver” rather than “consent” was clearly purposeful (and a distinction that Robin Effron and John Coyle have recently explored). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:26 am
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that the president “is not above the law. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:28 am
In counties that voted Democratic both times, Obama ran up a margin that was 135,000 votes larger than Barrett had. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 12:34 pm
For example, John F. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
By resolving the issue on standing grounds, the Court left that important question unanswered.That was an especially unfortunate result because Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s majority opinion could have supported a merits ruling. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm
” Barrett asked. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
After this initial offer, Balducci called back and said he wanted the judge to merely delay the dispute because the plaintiff, Jackson lawyer John Jones, was having financial problems. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Cooper, Tom Tomorrow, Judi Barrett, Christopher Myers...and many more! [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
Bruen Decision on June 23, 2022 Packed and Loaded: Stanford’s John Donohue on Supreme Court’s Guns Decision by Professor John J. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
If nominated and confirmed, the 51-year-old Jackson would be the first Black woman on the court and also one of the youngest justices – second only to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who celebrated her 50th birthday on Friday. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Sebelius, the Supreme Court (in a majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) upheld the individual mandate as a constitutionally valid exercise of Congress’s taxing power. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
Last week Senator Dick Durbin invited Chief Justice Roberts to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
