Search for: "John Doe #2"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2021, 4:45 pm
For further guidance on these and other related matters, please contact John D. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
The Board reverses about 1 in 10 Section 2(d) refusals, or on the average about two per month. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:10 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
John Kitzhaber is confronting a barrage of criticism, calls for his resignation, and a potential recall petition. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:11 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:21 am
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:33 am
And so the Board was unable to assess the impact of Applicant's long use on the purchasing public.In sum, Applicant failed to carry its heavy burden under Section 2(f).TTABlog comment: Compare the Board's analysis here with that in recent Hershey case [TTABlogged here], where the Board was careful in recognizing that although a design may be de facto functional, the details or refinements may not be de jure functional: i.e, the scoring on the Hershey bar has a utilitarian purpose,… [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Tim Kevan, a good mate, has branched out with a new series of humorous law post on his Barrister blog: My new series of humourous legal posts Professor John Flood’s RATs blog is another of my favourites – veering as it does between the serious and irreverent. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:05 am
[Query: does TURANZA suggest Turin? [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Kurt Lash, The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents (University of Chicago Press, 2021)(2 vols.). [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:16 pm
Is John McCain eligible to serve as President of the United States? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:00 am
That does not make them attractive motives. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
(John Elwood) There may not be much interest among the general readership in today’s opinion in Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:00 am
Resp. at 2. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:32 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:10 am
The test for similarity of the marks is the same under dilution and Section 2(d) anyway.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
