Search for: "John Branch"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The Executive branch says they do; the House says they don’t. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
We conclude next Monday with an essay on the Symposium’s closing remarks delivered by Adrian Vermeule, the John H. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:08 am
I do not rise to oppose John Brennan’s nomination simply for the person. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Yet John Yoo issued the Opinion in his own name. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:01 am
" (The House Judiciary Committee's ranking member John Conyers is suggesting just that.) [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 10:35 pm
As Professor John Monahan has stated, "the question I want to raise is whether evolutionary psychology [a branch of cognitive science] . . . could play the same central role in legal scholarship for the next thirty years that economics has played for the past thirty. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
White and Roger Pilon on Alexander Bickel’s The Least Dangerous Branch, the topic of one of our recent online symposia. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 12:10 pm
The crew of Coast Guard Cutter John McCormick arrived on scene Thursday at approximately 10:30 a.m., and took the Elise Marie in tow toward Yakutat. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:17 am
He wants to close the courthouse doors to challengers with tenuous legal grounds or claims, thereby limiting the role of the judicial branch. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:13 pm
The debate is not on the English Magna Carta of 1215 between King John and English barons, but on the Irish Magna Carta of 1216 between King Henry (don’t ask me which one, John’s son, I think) and the Irish barons. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:00 am
The tale continues after the Civil War with Justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes, who clashed over the limits of majority rule. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
John's), Barbara Stark (Hofstra), Jennifer Trahan (NYU), and, of course, ABILA President Ruth Wedgwood (Johns Hopkins).Registration for the conference, which is free to members of cosponsoring organizations, is here; full program details are here. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 1:28 am
Berkeley law professor Christopher Kutz has written about the repugnance of secret law, but apparently it's his colleague John Yoo's specialty. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had a similar political split based on the party of the president who appointed them with Chief Justice John Roberts (Bush) and Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy (Reagan), Clarence Thomas (Bush I) and Samuel Alito (Bush II) on one side with Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton), Stephen Breyer (Clinton), Sonia Sotomayor (Obama), and Elena Kagan (Obama) on the other. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:06 am
” Senator John McCain, long a proponent of decisive and overwhelming victory in many places around the globe, swiftly condemned the change. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:30 am
Hart countered legal theorist John Austin’s view of positive law—sovereign commands backed by threats—with a more nuanced view of what Hart called positivist law, which involved “a union of primary and secondary rules. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:45 am
” Whether the political branches will accept the Chief Justice’s invitation to revisit such a broadening of whistleblower protections in general, or in national security cases specifically, remains to be seen. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 4:15 am
The Supreme Court of the John Roberts era gets one thing very right: It’s one of the most free-speech-protective courts in modern history. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:06 pm
So Finnis tries to show that his position is not extreme by reference to the implicit commitments of one branch of a "great pan-European authority" yet that same position is explicitly condemned as extremist by another branch of the same pan-European authority. [read post]
