Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
In Weingarten v Kopelowitz, 2020 NY Slip Op 51260(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2020], the plaintiff brought suit individually and derivatively on behalf of a Delaware LLC in which he held a one-third membership agreement after he was terminated as property manager of multi-unit rental properties in Tennessee owned indirectly by the LLC. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
In light of those immunity doctrines and the unique structural role and constitutional status of the President of the United States, the Court concluded that Nixon was “entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm by Christine Kexel Chabot
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Whether the no-stating-the-tax provision is more akin to a price-advertising ban (governed by the commercial-speech doctrine) or to a ban on protesting a new tax in the forum most likely to get consumers' attention (governed by the political-speech doctrine) need not detain us. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
” He got the hint and filed an amicus brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by David Kopel
Their relations with the United States were governed by treaties ratified by the Senate. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm by Orin S. Kerr
It has recognized that a search occurs whether the particular method employed by the government entails a "compelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body" (Winston v Lee, 470 US 753, 759 [1985]; see Schmerber, 384 US at 767); "gentle" or "light" contact with the body (see Maryland v King, 569 US 435, 446 [2013]); "brief" contact with "outer clothing" (Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1, 24-25 [1968]);… [read post]