Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 1181 - 1200 of 269,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 7:39 am by Chelsea Caswell
But, on August 20, 2024, the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order and a Final Judgment in the Ryan LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:20 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Fortunately, the law provides a way to seek financial compensation for these losses. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(concurring in part and dissenting in part), agreed with the majority, but in his view the February 17, 2012 incident constituted "an accident, not unlike that [described] in Matter of Loia v DiNapoli, 164 AD3d 1513". [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(concurring in part and dissenting in part), agreed with the majority, but in his view the February 17, 2012 incident constituted "an accident, not unlike that [described] in Matter of Loia v DiNapoli, 164 AD3d 1513". [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:50 am by Janet Lord
In contemporary times, more sophisticated syndicates target persons with disabilities for economic exploitation, as in the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:29 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Seth Barrett Tillman (National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law) has posted What We Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” This excerpt says that step one has been to bombard agencies with inquiries about how the decision will impact their work: GOP lawmakers cheered the Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 10:28 pm
It nonetheless says that if the lawyer received material in "confidence" (or "secrets") from a client, the lawyer and the firm is disqualified --unless there's effective screening, which there wasn't here.Where the Court of Appeal errs, in my view, is when it holds that the law firm here didn't receive any confidential information from the client.It's quite plausible that Justice Ramirez is right that the "income" information that the… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
We do not see any adequate reason why Texas's law may be enforced pending the [Supreme Court's] decision on the merits in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]