Search for: "Little v State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 26,881
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
Anthony Graves hagiographyCheck out a sweet little profile of exoneree and Houston crime-lab board member Anthony Graves at Houstonia. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:46 am
The little ones in Michigan mentioned “they did everything proper by registering with the state of Michigan. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Little mistakes can cause serious consequences. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
I'm a little surprised that this opinion is unanimous.There are three different possible interpretations of the part of the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 USC 1367(d), that says that state limitations periods are "tolled" during the pendency of a federal action (and for thirty days thereafter) if the federal court ultimately exercises its discretion to dismiss supplemental state law claims. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
Given the JOBS Act mandate to revitalize Regulation A, the SEC concluded that the potential decrease in investor protection was balanced by the reduced costs for Tier 2 issuers and purchasers.Although NASAA's amicus brief had faulted the SEC for relying on “little to no evidence” regarding the costs of state law compliance and state law preemption, the Commission did not have the data necessary to quantify those costs precisely because Regulation A was… [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
At least since Altria v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:05 pm
Here's a tiny little one off his plate. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
Have Laws Authorizing and Permitting Random Drug Testing of Employees of Private Employers With Little or No Limitation According to our reading of the blr.com survey, the following states have a law authorizing random drug testing for private sector employers, with little limitation: Alabama Alaska Arizona Washington, D.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
1–800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:32 am
In Scampone v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:35 pm
By Ian Millhiser: Alito’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:36 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
