Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
  It's website notes thatIn February, 2009, ZTE Corporation has formally become a member of the United Nations Global Compact. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by John H Curley
Explaining the distinction, the Court observed:In recognizing that a clear public policy existed in prohibiting the reinstatement of police officers who falsified reports, the Fourth District specifically emphasized that the statute recognizes that “the police force of a municipal corporation is obligated to ‘preserve the peace, protect persons and property, and obey and enforce * * * all criminal laws of the states and the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:53 am by Florian Mueller
In June, Judge Richard Posner, sitting by designation on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, also canceled a trial shortly before it was supposed to begin.The Wisconsin situation has no bearing on the Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:57 am by Larry
United States, a recent decision from the CIT.The issue came up in the context of swimwear that was imported into the United States and then sent to a warehouse in Canada to be held in inventory until sold. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
  On April 3, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued the first federal court decision on this issue in Noble v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:40 pm by Raymond Millien
” The United States switches from a “first to invent” jurisdiction to a “first to file” jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am by Rob Robinson
While the United States is generally regarded as trailing Europe and other parts of the world when it comes to privacy and data protection regulation, corporations and their counsel need keep up with the developing corpus of data privacy laws worldwide. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
  Employers united: an empirical analysis of corporate political speech in the wake of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:58 pm
In addition, the structure of the agreements between Ingenico and VeriFone, the only two significant POS sellers in the United States post-merger, enhances VeriFone and Ingenico’s ability to coordinate pricing for all POS terminals.The complaint is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]