Search for: "Long v. Clark"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
The standard for modification of a negotiated child support agreement has long been that of “changed circumstances. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:32 am
Law Lessons from LISA MICCINILLI (f/n/a COLLINS) V. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
In this case (Davis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:56 am
V. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
The only way to do justice is to provide opportunities for justice. 50 years ago, in Gideon v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
See Griggs v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:19 am
” RollonFriday is definitely hitting the high notes this week with this wonderful story… Barrister’s dog obtains an MBA – and other animal stories: “The judgment in the long running Sky -v- EDS case was handed down this week, to the delight of Herbert Smith and its clients BSkyB. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Pornography * Clark v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Persons do not carry hepatitis A long-term as with hepatitis B and C. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
In a long running personal injury case, Wilson v North Lanarkshire Council and others, the party litigant, Martin Wilson, asked the court to permit him a McKenzie Friend at a hearing on 17 November. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
” Knight v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Fulton v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:29 am
V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
In that regard, it is axiomatic that “a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
Mr Clarke did not take that decision alone. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
Mr Clarke did not take that decision alone. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:30 am
Partly it is because we cannot understand the new regime without understanding Conley and everything that came before 2007 (Charles Clark, the Forms, etc.); partly it is because the new regime seems so inconsistent with everything that came before; partly it is because we do not know how long the new regime will last, given the murmurings in Congress. [read post]
