Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
It is the State and its Courts that have authority to coerce a Party who has not complied with his bargain. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
DONE at the city of Washington this thirty-first day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred eighty and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred fifth. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
The question was also not addressed by the House of Lords. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 2:26 am
Lord Briggs giving the lead judgment, held that the principle of equivalence required that the procedural rules of member states applicable to claims based on EU law are no less favourable than those governing similar domestic claims [3]. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others [2011] EWCA Civ 808 In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see the UK Human Rights Blog contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to have been on the side of the angels. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:05 am
re v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:18 am
Dame Janet Smith, in wording subsequently wholly endorsed by Lord Hutton, stated: “… in my view Article 10(1) does not bear upon the right of access to information that another holds but has not made accessible and does not wish to impart… The first sentence states the principle: ‘Everyone has the right of freedom of expression’. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
The House of Lords begins the Committee Stage of the Data Protection Bill on 30 October 2017. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
This Kat did not have time to get round to reading Hospira v Genentech when it first emerged, and did not immediately notice that it was an entire new case in its own right, and not simply a codicil to the decision that he reported here. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
Lord Mance gives the leading judgment of the Court. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
The Lord Ordinary upheld their challenge on other grounds but indicated that, if necessary, she would have upheld the challenge under the Directive. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The cornerstone of the Claimants’ case was the decision of the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health & Another, in which it ruled that the procedure under the Care Standards Act 2000 of allowing the provision listing of care workers onto a similar ‘barred from work’ list as to the present case without their being able to make representations ran contrary to article 6 and article 8 rights. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am
The leading flooding case in Texas is Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:35 am
The appellants, SC and CB (“the adult appellants”), SC’s three youngest children and CB’s five children (“the child appellants”), brought proceedings against the respondents, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the Lords Commissioners of HM Treasury, and the Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:06 pm
Here the applicant sought to benefit from a scheme whereby the dependants of a holder of a refugee card were entitled to housing assistance from the State. [read post]
