Search for: "MATTER OF H C R"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2011, 8:06 pm
C. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, concluding that the drivers were properly classified as a matter of law and not entitled to trial on their claims. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm
And yes, they matter more than before, thanks to the tough legal job market. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:07 pm
Section 101.93(f) simply restates part of the definition of the types of claims that may be made under section 403(r)(6) of the FD&C Act. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Don't despair. 581 F.3d 1104 (2009) In the Matter of Antoinette DUMONT, Debtor, Antoinette Dumont, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
John H. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:51 pm
THE ‘ORIGINAL INFORMATION’ REQUIREMENT: A THREAT TO INTERNAL COMPLIANCE Under Dodd-Frank, whistle-blowers cannot collect a reward unless they directly provide the government with “original information” not already known to the enforcement agency from another source.9 Incidentally, voicing one’s concerns through the company’s internal compliance system or ethics hotline will run the risk that management may decide to voluntarily report the… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
(c).) [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
Thomas H. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Clarence C. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 10:57 pm
Consult an experienced health care law attorney who knows complementary medicine and integrative medicine for legal advice pertaining to any project involving allied health or CAM professionals. *** Michael H. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
Attorney General Eric H. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:39 am
N-H Farms, Inc. (2d Dept. 2005) - $425,000 for 43 year old Guttierez v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
And there is prize - a copy of Privacy and Freedom of Expression by R Clayton and H Tomlinson (OUP, 2010) – kindly donated by the authors. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:40 am
P. 192.3(h). 9. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
Gaitis, C. von Kann, R. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
This is a matter of the applicant’s choice. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am
h. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Here is what the Board had to say on the alleged inadmissible extension:[2.1.1] The sole objection raised under A 100(c) concerned the question of whether or not the amendments of the structural formulae representing oxazoline derivatives, found to be allowable under R 88 EPC 1973 (now R 139 EPC 2000) during examination proceedings, introduced subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
