Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The simplest approach in concept probably would be to remove or override domestic legal prohibitions on disclosure, where desired, in response to certain types of favored foreign production directives.[37]  As a matter of U.S. law, this would not be difficult technically (although it might be very challenging politically). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:15 am by Simon Fodden
A fine vibration seemed to blur his hands as they hovered just above the K-54 on table in front of him. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:26 am by Anthony Zaller
  Class certification is not a ruling on the merits of the case, but only whether the case is one that there a sufficient similarities between all of the class members’ claims that enable to court to decide the matter on a class wide basis. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:27 am by Ettinger Law Firm
But what of the millions of Americans who have neither – no pension nor 401(k) or 403(b) options? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
§10.85(k), “[a] statement or advice given by an FDA employee . [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 am by Jan von Hein
However, once again, the Court has failed to further elaborate on the criteria necessary for the classification of an action as an insolvency-related action within the meaning of art. 3 EIR and art. 1 para. 2 lit. b Brussels I-reg. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm by Greg Mersol
As to the court’s analysis of the class issues themselves, the court certified the claims under Rule 23(b)(3), and its opinion focuses, appropriately, on the issue of predominance. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:59 am by Broc Romanek
I Agree That The Optics Aren’t Good – In a great illustration of “perception matters,” a plain face reading of the email that Cook sent to Cramer makes the securities lawyer in me cringe. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers sponsoring health plans and members of their management named as plan fiduciaries or otherwise having input or oversight over the health plan should verify their company’s group health plan meets the out-of-pocket maximum rules of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1) as well as a long list of other federal health benefit rules to minimize the risk that violations will obligate the sponsoring employer to self-assess, self-report on IRS Form 8928, and… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:43 am by Rachel Ambler
For public companies, an argument could be made that their 10-K and 10-Q filings are public record. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:10 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
And the 180-day delay does matter in this case because Amgen’s 12-year exclusivity period has expired. [read post]