Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 42,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2008, 9:21 pm
From In the Matter of Scott A. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
IN THE MATTER OF A.C., J.C., AND H.C., __ N.J. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:45 am
[2] The Court’s ruling is understandable, and it is curious why the Court even deemed this a matter of first impression in view of its prior ruling in Mut. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:31 pm
Every legal matter can turn on specific facts. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
According to the Board, while in the electronic voting room and while the voting on the rule was underway, Hayes simultaneously participated in votes on other matters. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:32 pm
A lawyer can review any photo, video, or testimonial evidence and present the case in court if necessary. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
" Rule 801(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence defines hearsay as "a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Documentary evidence will need to be preserved too, and the investigator will have to demonstrate a proper chain of custody of the evidence if the matter ends up in court. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:00 pm
Enter Maryland's Court of Appeals, which ruled that HGN testimony is expert testimony, and requires that the witness first be qualified as an expert. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:45 pm
Judge Leon denied the Motion, ruling that the trial will continue.Under the rules of evidence, hearsay statements are excluded – what a witness who is not at trial said outside the courtroom is not admissible. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:36 pm
Additionally, it is arbitrary and capricious for plan administrators to rely on flawed peer reviews that mischaracterize evidence, ignore evidence, or come to findings contradicted by the evidence. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
” Under the appropriate “substantial evidence” standard of review both trial and appellate courts review the whole record to determine whether the agency’s findings are supported by substantial evidence, i.e., “evidence of ponderable legal significance, reasonable in nature, credible, and of solid value, evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,” and the burden is on appellant to show no… [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Hearsay and Its Exceptions The phrase “dying declaration” references one of many exceptions to the hearsay rule, a critical principle of evidence in both civil and criminal courts. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:10 am
(previously proposed appeal rules). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
The duty underlies the use of AI systems in matters before the USPTO. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
In an odd ruling, the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, in the matter of State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:47 am
Leiza Dolghih Attorney, Godwin Lewis PC Last week, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals issued a ruling in a case involving a non-compete agreement between a legal services company in Texas and its former marketing director. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:36 pm
Evan points out that the court went so far as to conclude that the Yelp post was not hearsay to begin with because “It was not being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to demonstrate the consumer’s confusion — a then-existing mental state of the declarant, which is an exception to the hearsay rule. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:40 am
It might seem self-evident that the Business Judgment Rule applies to decisions made by the managers of a limited liability company, but if you were looking for a North Carolina case to cite on that point before last week, you wouldn't have found one. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:37 am
Walton had ruled that prosecutors could not introduce such evidence because it would be prejudicial to Clemens. [read post]
